Cases 11 - 20 of 45
DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. ALL FILINGS SHOULD BE DOCKETED IN 5:21-CT-3020-DThe Estate of Daniel D. Coddington v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021cv00028
Defendant:
University of Massachusetts Medical School, RN A. Eddins, APRN-CNP Caleb Meyer and others
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Daniel D. Coddington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
The Estate of Daniel D. Coddington v. United States of America et al
as 4:2021cv00007
Defendant:
University of Massachusetts Medical School, RN A. Eddins, APRN-CNP Caleb Meyer and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Coddington and The Estate of Daniel D. Coddington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Michelson v. Beck et al
as 1:2020cv00205
Defendant:
John B. Maddux, Gill P. Beck and David Q. Burgess
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Michelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILL v. USA
as 1:2020cv00844
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
MAURICE DANJUAN GILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lopez et al v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 3:2020cv00386
Plaintiff:
Paul Imrie, Della Lopez, Shella Gill and others
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America and Diana Imrie
GILL v. USA
as 1:2019cv01203
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
MAURICE DANJUAN GILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00681
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
FRANCHI v. CEMPRA, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00898
Defendant:
CEMPRA, INC., CASTLE ACQUISTION CORPORATION, GARHENG KONG and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY FRANCHI
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
TRAN v. CEMPRA, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00870
Plaintiff:
NHU TRAN
Defendant:
CEMPRA, INC., GARHENG KONG, DAVID ZACCARDELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
