Cases 11 - 20 of 233
Rice v. Olin Winchester LLC
as 7:2023cv00621
Plaintiff:
Jared Rice
Defendant:
ARCOSA LW BR LLC, Winchester Industrial Products, Broadspire Insurance Company Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Coleman et al v. The Town of Brookside, Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00423
Plaintiff:
Brittany Coleman, Brandon Jones, Chekeithia Grant and others
Defendant:
The Town of Brookside, Alabama, Jett's Towing, Inc. and Marcus Sellers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dick v. Wilson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00353
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Grant Dick
Defendant:
B. Wilson, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and Daniel Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Stewart et al
as 1:2021cv00076
Plaintiff:
Carsbia Van Taylor
Defendant:
Phillip Mitchell, Terry Rabon, Cynthia Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gannon v. Ainsworth
as 2:2021cv00142
Plaintiff:
Grant Gannon
Defendant:
Will Ainsworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pilcher v. Dunn et al
as 4:2021cv00204
Defendant:
Gary Malone, William Curtis Streeter, Jefferson Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
J Thomas Pilcher, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Scroggin et al
as 5:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
Tanesha Cole
Defendant:
Jesse Scroggin and Logan Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanberry v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00059
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Kay Ivey, Brookwood Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Michael Stanberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Grant et al
as 1:2021cv00005
Defendant:
Justin Grant, M.C. Dean, Inc. and Hudson Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Brittany Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
