Cases 11 - 20 of 3,004
Phillips et al v. Dream Chasers Carter LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Phillips and Gayle Glass Phillips
Defendant:
Dream Chasers Carter LLC and Djimon Dante Duvall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Swindle v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2024cv00695
Plaintiff:
Gayle Swindle
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Blevins v. Arora et al
as 5:2024cv02954
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Blevins
Defendant:
Nikesh Arora, Nir Zuk, Aparna Bawa and others
Safeco Insurance Company of Oregon v. Vauss et al
as 1:2024cv02063
Plaintiff:
Safeco Insurance Company of Oregon
Defendant:
Tawanda Vauss, Vincent Vauss and Sharon Gayle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Curry v. Southstar Fndg LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01986
Plaintiff:
Tajuana Gayle Curry
Defendant:
Southstar Fndg LLC and Aldridge Pite LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Gois et al v. Kisco Senior Living, LLC
as 3:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
Paul Gois, G. G. and Gayle Gois
Defendant:
Kisco Senior Living, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Silva et al v. Arora et al
as 3:2024cv02350
Plaintiff:
Nathan Silva and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Defendant:
Nikesh Arora, Nir Zuk, Aparna Bawa and others
Grayson v. United States of America, The
as 3:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Gayle Grayson
Defendant:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
R A W L L C et al v. Tank Holding Corp
as 6:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
R.A.W., LLC, R&G Broussard LLC, Roger and Gayle, LLC and others
Defendant:
Tank Holding Corp. and Tank Holding Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Evans v. Evans
as 24-60152
Plaintiff:
Gayle J. Evans, Jr., a Montana Resident
Defendant:
Chance J. Evans, a Mississippi Resident
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
