Cases 11 - 20 of 3,959
Gilles et al v. American Strategic Insurance Corp.
as 2:2024cv00392
Petitioner:
Michel Gilles, Marjorie Gilles and Estate of Guetty V. Gilles
Respondent:
American Strategic Insurance Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
White v. Chronister et al
as 8:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
David Lee White
Defendant:
Chad Chronister, Valdez M. Nelson Guzman, S. Colin Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Wescott et al
as 2:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Gill
Defendant:
NFN Wescott, NFN Mendoza and NFN Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raymond Gill v. Jennifer Broton, et al
as 24-11236
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND EDWARD GILL
Defendant:
JENNIFER A. BROTON, AVERY, B. PAVIGLIQNTI and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01188
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gill v. Marsh USA, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02366
Plaintiff:
Manpreet Gill
Defendant:
Marsh USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Robert Bostic v. Sumter County Police Department
as 24-6351
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LAWRENCE BOSTIC
Defendant:
CITY OF SUMTER COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JESSICA HATCHLEY, HEATH L. GARDNER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gill v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq01098
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
David Gill
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
