Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Nationwide Automated Systems, Inc et al
as 3:2014mc00213
Plaintiff:
Securities & Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Nationwide Automated Systems, Inc, Joel Gillis and Edward Wishner
Receiver:
William Hoffman
Wood v Henderson County Detention, et al
as 1:2014cv00291
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cain Wood
Defendant:
Henderson County Detention, Cpl. Blackwell, Sheriff McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Gillis et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 7:2014cv00185
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC
Plaintiff:
Annjeanette Gillis , Daqwan Robinson , Woody Gillis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gillis et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 4:2014cv00159
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC
Plaintiff:
Annjeanette Gillis , Daqwan Robinson , Woody Gillis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GILLIS v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00426
Plaintiff:
STEVEN F. GILLIS
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Gillis v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2013cv00260
Plaintiff:
Angalis H Gillis
Defendant:
City of Charlotte and Altonio Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Myers et al v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2012cv00714
Plaintiff:
Loushonda Myers, C.M., A.M. and others
Defendant:
The State of North Carolina, Krista L. Bennet, Fern Gunn Simeon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Gillis v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00731
Plaintiff:
Janea M. Gillis
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00350
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Gillis v. Beck
as 5:2008hc02016
Petitioner:
Clarence Gillis
Respondent:
Theodis Beck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
