Cases 11 - 20 of 108
Beverly Hills Regional Surgery Center, L.P. v. Group Hospitalization and Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01217
Plaintiff:
Beverly Hills Regional Surgery Center, L.P.
Defendant:
CAREFIRST BLUECROSS AND BLUESHIELD, Group Hospitalization and Medical Services, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
CareFirst of Maryland, Inc. et al v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 1:2022cv01362
Plaintiff:
CareFirst of Maryland, Inc., Group Hospitalization and Medical Services, Inc., CareFirst BlueChoice, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 2:2022cv00261
Defendant:
Highmark Inc doing business as Blueshield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as HealthNow New York Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Hoover, Sharon Zebley, Erick Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 1:2021cv09101
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, PREMERA and Premera Blue Cross, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
as 1:2021cv02805
Counter Defendant:
JANE SMITH
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
3Rd Party Defendant:
CORAM CVS SPECIALTY INFUSION SERVICES, CAREFIRST OF MARYLAND, INC. doing business as CAREFIRST BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD, GROUP HOSPITALIZATION AND MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. doing business as CAREFIRST BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 1:2021cv23448
Defendant:
Highmark, Inc. doing business as BlueShield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as HealthNow New York, Inc., Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Hoover, Sharon Zebley, Erick Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reyes v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2021cv01235
Plaintiff:
Mishanta Reyes
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem Inc, Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
CareFirst of Maryland, Inc. et al v. CVS Health Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00223
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation and CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Plaintiff:
BlueChoice HealthPlan of South Carolina, Inc., CareFirst of Maryland, Inc., Group Hospitalization and Medical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aton Center v. CareFirst of Maryland, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03170
Defendant:
Group Hospitalization and Medical Services, Inc., CareFirst of Maryland, Inc., CareFirst BlueChoice, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Aton Center and Aton Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
