Cases 11 - 20 of 46
BioQ Pharma Incorporated v. GS Holding et al
as 3:2023cv00399
Defendant:
Star Capital Investments LLC, Star Capital LLC, Star Capital and others
Plaintiff:
BioQ Pharma Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States of America v. Dhinsa
as 22-1211
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gulzar Singh, AKA Vippan Sareem, Otilio Galvan and Antonio Galvan
Defendant / Appellant:
Gurmeet Singh Dhinsa
Gurmeet Sran v. Attorney General United States of America
as 22-1685
Petitioner:
GURMEET SINGH SRAN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Singh v. Garland
as 21-6303
Petitioner:
GURMEET SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
ORNELAS et al v. DEOL et al
as 5:2020cv00058
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY V. ORNELAS, MARIA ELENA ORNELAS and JAZMIN M. ORNELAS
Defendant:
1527530 ONTARIO, INC. and GURMEET SINGH DEOL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U-Haul Company of Arizona v. Lee et al
as 2:2020cv00082
Defendant:
Lynn Trucking Incorporated, Amanda King, Mountain River Trucking Company Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
U-Haul Company of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Gurmeet Singh v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-73092
Petitioner:
GURMEET SINGH
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
ACOSTA v. NS & GS LLC et al
as 1:2017cv05384
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
NS & GS LLC, SEHJOG LLC, S. HARI SINGH MGT INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Singh v. Cisco General Construction Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03048
Defendant:
Cisco General Construction Inc., East Coast USA Construction Inc, Balwinder Kaur and others
Plaintiff:
Gurmeet Singh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Dhinsa v. Krueger
as 17-874
Petitioner - Appellant:
Gurmeet Singh Dhinsa
Respondent - Appellee:
J. E. Krueger, as Warden of FCI Schuylkill
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
