Cases 11 - 20 of 13,847
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Hamilton, Kevin L. v. Ardon et al
as 2:2024cv14149
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamont Hamilton
Defendant:
Tony Ardon, Tyler Ludlow and Sheriff William D. Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2024cv03067
Petitioner:
Pierre Quaran Hamilton
Respondent:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lynwood Pickens v. Hamilton-Ryker IT Solutions, LLC
as 24-5459
Plaintiff:
LYNWOOD PICKENS, Individually and For Others Similarly Situated
Defendant:
HAMILTON-RYKER IT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Hamilton-Schmutz v. Lumico Life Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Dana Hamilton-Schmutz
Defendant:
Lumico Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMILTON v. BROTHERS et al
as 2:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
SHAWN HAMILTON
Defendant:
MARK BROTHERS, AMY VARNER and DONALD BECHOTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Yasinov v. United States et al
as 2:2024cv01939
Plaintiff:
Igor Yasinov
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, BRYANT, DR. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HAMILTON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2024cv02011
Petitioner:
AMIR HAMILTON
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
