Cases 11 - 20 of 89
Hale v. Davis et al
as 3:2022cv01041
Plaintiff:
Alex Hale
Defendant:
Quinton Davis, Joshua Robinson and Kritlen
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALE v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02036
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HALE
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC and MARITAL KNIESER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALE v. WHITSETT et al
as 1:2022cv01830
Plaintiff:
ALEX L. HALE
Defendant:
DAVID LAWRENCE WHITSETT, CLINTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, INDIANA SEX AND VIOLENT OFFENDER REGISTRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTSON v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2022cv01193
Plaintiff:
HERBERT E. ROBERTSON
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CONYERS, WEXFORD HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KELLY v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KELLY
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, KAY WILKS, M.D., CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HALE v. BOTTOMS et al
as 3:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ROSS HALE
Defendant:
TIMOTHY BOTTOMS, C.O. WOODS, C.O. 001 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAIN v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv00621
Plaintiff:
DURELL T. CRAIN
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., J. BASINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Kelley
as 1:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Wade P. Hale
Defendant:
Jared Kelley
Not Classified By Court:
Anthony M Stites
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Hale v. Kelley
as 1:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Wade P Hale
Defendant:
Jared Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HALE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv03084
Plaintiff:
DIANE HALE
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
