Cases 11 - 20 of 144
Bones v. Superintendent et al
as 5:2023hc02036
Petitioner:
John Hamilton Bones
Respondent:
Superintendent and Secretary of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WADDELL et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Aaron Waddell, Abreka Regues, Albert Sidney Palmer and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TMX FINANCE OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
ESTATE OF JOSEPH LOPEZ v. HAMILTON et al
as 1:2022cv00421
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF JOSEPH LOPEZ
Defendant:
MATTHEW HAMILTON and CITY OF GREENSBORO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strickland v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00112
Petitioner:
Cain Hamilton Strickland
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sloan
as 4:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Hamilton Sloan, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 183 Limitation of Liability
Hamilton v. United States of America
as 5:2022ct03108
Plaintiff:
Shannon R. Hamilton
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Hamilton v. United States of America
as 5:2022ct03101
Plaintiff:
Shannon R. Hamilton
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Jones v. Hamilton et al
as 4:2021cv00065
Defendant:
Jane Ammons Gilchrist, Antwan Rayshawn Hamilton and NC Department of Safety
Plaintiff:
Amber Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Hamilton et al
as 5:2021ct03122
Defendant:
Jane Ammons Gilchrist, Antwan Rayshawn Hamilton and NC Department of Safety
Plaintiff:
Amber Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Gilchrist et al
as 4:2021cv00066
Defendant:
Jane Ammons Gilchrist, NC Department of Public Safety and Antwan Rayshawn Hamilton
Plaintiff:
Amber Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
