Cases 11 - 20 of 2,293
H. v. G6 Hospitality LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00939
Plaintiff:
Catelyn H.
Defendant:
G6 Hospitality LLC, Wyndham Hotel & Resorts, Inc., Las Vegas Sands Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Sechrist v. Harding
as 5:2024cv00503
Petitioner:
Tye A Sechrist
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Pickens v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
Darrin Lynn Pickens
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Harding v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03072
Plaintiff:
Torie M Harding
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Trupia v. Heritage Hard Assets LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Anthony Trupia
Defendant:
Heritage Hard Assets LLC, Kyle Patton, HLV Ventures and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Schottelkotte v. Hard Rock Casino Cincinnati, LLC
as 1:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Karen Schottelkotte
Defendant:
Hard Rock Casino Cincinnati, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Joe Teague, Jr. v. Arthur Gepner
as 24-1393
Plaintiff:
JOE EDWARDS TEAGUE, JR.
Defendant:
ARTHUR L. GEPNER, for Cherokee Federal d/b/a CN3S, BOBBY DETTMER, Flux Resources LLC, CLINT BUCKLEY, Flux Resources LLC and others
Montgomery v. Seminole Hard Rock Digital, LLC
as 8:2024cv01062
Plaintiff:
Brandon Montgomery
Defendant:
Seminole Hard Rock Digital, LLC
Harding v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Scott Harding
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
