Cases 11 - 20 of 49
ROWSER v. WEXFORD HEALTH CARE SERVICES HENRY COUNTY et al
as 1:2021cv02457
Plaintiff:
CORY A. ROWSER
Defendant:
WESFORD HEALTH CARE SERVICES HENRY COUNTY, DANIEL O. RIPPATOE, JENNIFER A. HARMON-NARY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROWSER v. WEXFORD HEALTH CARE SERVICES, HENRY COUNTY et al
as 1:2021cv02400
Plaintiff:
CORY A. ROWSER
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH CARE SERVICES, HENRY COUNTY, DANIEL O. RIPPATOE, JENNIFER A. HARMAN-NARY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUKE v. REID HOSPITAL & HEALTH CARE SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2021cv02138
Plaintiff:
KERRI DUKE
Defendant:
REID HOSPITAL & HEALTH CARE SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ra
HAWKINS v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2021cv01465
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL PROVIDER-HEALTH CARE SERVICES, LT. STORMS and WARDEN MARK SEVIER
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND HAWKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HATTON v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2020cv02609
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DIVISION OF MEDICAL AND CLINICAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES and WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY N. HATTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NAYLOR v. WEXFORD HEALTH CARE SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv01596
Defendant:
PAUL TALBOT, KREISER, PURDUE and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN NAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Malik et al
as 2:2020cv00189
Defendant:
Mohammed Huzaifa Malik, Ahmed Raad Malik, Rehana Y Malik and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley A Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
SHUCK v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2020cv00322
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH CARE SERVICES INC. and PAUL TALBOT
Plaintiff:
NOEL SHUCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLE v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2019cv04601
Plaintiff:
THOMAS COLE
Defendant:
PAUL TALBOT and WEXFORD HEALTH CARE SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUESS v. LEVINE et al
as 1:2019cv04558
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH CARE SERVICES INC. and LEVINE
Plaintiff:
BRUCE GUESS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
