Cases 11 - 20 of 114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ost-Lasker v. White et al
as 4:2022cv06110
Plaintiff:
Lisa-Kathleen Ost-Lasker
Defendant:
Daniel White, Sandy Baldwin, Will Akin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Trotter v. Daise et al
as 5:2022cv06099
Plaintiff:
Joshua Trotter
Defendant:
Cody Daise and Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ost-Lasker v. White et al
as 5:2022cv06110
Plaintiff:
Lisa-Kathleen Ost-Lasker
Defendant:
Daniel White, Sandy Baldwin, Will Akin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Holmes v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 5:2022cv06088
Plaintiff:
Rodney B Holmes
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, Phyllis Phelps, Emily Nixdorf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Precythe et al
as 6:2022cv03164
Plaintiff:
Jared Williams, Anthony Zarro, Antonio West and others
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Anna Boyles, Joan Reinkemeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Falkenrath
as 4:2022cv00679
Petitioner:
DonRico Holmes
Respondent:
Warden Doris Falkenrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holm v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00326
Plaintiff:
David E. Holm
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Holmes et al v. Knodell
as 2:2022cv04026
Plaintiff:
Mary Holmes, L. V. and Empower Missouri
Defendant:
Robert Knodell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibson v. Hadzic et al
as 4:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Shannon Gibson
Defendant:
Officer Unknown Hadzic, Officer Unknown Holmes and St. Louis County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
