Cases 11 - 20 of 115
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Bonsignore Trial Lawyers, LLC, et al
as 22-16678
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION and CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellee:
BONSIGNORE TRIAL LAWYERS, LLC, GRAY ECHAVARRIA, GLORIA COMEAUX and others
Defendant:
TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 22-16537
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellant:
LAW OFFICES OF FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA
Defendant:
TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-16699
Petitioner / Appellant:
HARRY GARAVANIAN, CHRIS SEUFERT, KERRY MURPHY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-15704
Defendant / Appellee:
TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELEANOR LEWIS, Proposed Intervenor
In re: Subpoena Issued to Labatt Food Service LLC
as 5:2022mc00245
In Re:
In re: Subpoena Issued to Labatt Food Service LLC
Plaintiff:
Commercial and Institutional Indirect Purchaser, Bi-Lo Holdings, LLC, Erbert & Gerbert's, Inc. and others
Defendant:
J.B.S., et al., National Beef Packing Company, JBS Packerland, Inc., et al. and others
Petitioner:
Labatt Food Service LLC
In Re: Subpoena to Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.
as 3:2021mc00084
In Re:
Subpoena to Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. and Pork Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Commercial and Institutional Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs
Defendant:
The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.
IN RE CAPACITORS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 3:2014cv03264
Plaintiff:
Michael Brooks, Mouser Electronics, Inc., Gossett Motor Cars, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Shizuki Electric Co., Inc., Kemet Corporation, NEC Tokin America, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Digi-Key Corporation, Quathimatine Holdings, Inc. and Five Rivers Electronic Innovations, LLC
Intervenor:
United States of America
Not Classified By Court:
Satoshi Okubo
Respondent:
Cambridge Capital Corporation
Interested Party:
Schuten Electronics, Inc. and Top Floor Home Improvements
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re: Subpoena to Pacific Agri-Products, Inc.
as 3:2021mc80241
In Re:
Pacific Agri-Products, Inc.
Plaintiff:
In Re: Subpoena to Pacific Agri-Products, Inc. and Commercial and Institutional Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs
In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2016cv08637
Plaintiff:
Maplevale Farms, Inc., Big Y Foods, Inc., Steve Mizera and others
Defendant:
Koch Foods, Inc, Claxton Poultry Farms, Inc., Amick Farms, LLC and others
Respondent:
R.W. Zant Co.
Petitioner:
Amigos Meat Distributors, LP, The Golub Corporation, The Distribution Group, Inc. (d/b/a Van Eerden Foodservice Company) and others
Special Master:
Maura R. Grossman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Indirect Purchaser Class, et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al
as 21-16291
Not Classified By Court:
In re: OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER CLASS
Appellant:
CONNER ERWIN
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA CORPORATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
