Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Rush v. Micron Technology Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00901
Plaintiff:
Edward Rush
Defendant:
Micron Technology Inc., Micron Semiconductor Products Inc., Infineon Technologies AG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
INFINEON TECH V MOSAID TECH
as 07-1085
Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee:
Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies Holding North America Corporation and Infineon Technologies Richmond LP
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee:
Infineon Technologies North America Corp.
Movant-Appellant:
Micron Technology, Inc.
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee:
Mosaid Technologies Incorporated
INFINEON TECH V MOSAID TECH
as 06-1115
Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee:
INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES RICHMOND LP and others
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee:
INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORP., INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORP. and INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORP.
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant:
MOSAID TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED, MOSAID TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED and MOSAID TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
MOSAID TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED:
, and
KAPLAN v. MICRON TECH., INC., et al
as 1:2005cv00012
Plaintiff:
LEONARD M. KAPLAN
Defendant:
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC., CRUCIAL TECHNOLOGY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
IN RE RAMBUS INC
as 04-M773
Respondent:
INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING NORTH AMERICA INC. and INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORP.
Petitioner:
RAMBUS INC.
IN RE RAMBUS INC
as 04-M772
Respondent:
INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING NORTH AMERICA INC. and INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORP.
Petitioner:
RAMBUS INC.
PHILLIPS V AWH CORP
as 03-1269
Amicus Curiae:
AD HOC COMMITTEE OF PATENT OWNERS IN THE WIRELESS INDUSTRY, AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
AWH CORPORATION, HOPEMAN BROTHERS, INC. and LOFTON CORPORATION
Plaintiff-Appellant:
EDWARD H. PHILLIPS
In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust Litigation
as 4:2002md01486
Plaintiff:
Oracle America, Inc., Petro Computer Systems, Inc., Ashley Pritchett and others
Intervenor:
Maurice Shelly, Daniel Anthony Weymouth, Patrick J. Simpson and others
Not Classified By Court:
norman d palmer, Norman D. Palmer, Bryan Marcus and others
Defendant:
Korea Development Bank, Hyundai Heavy Industries, Co., Ltd., NEC Electronics Corporation and others
Petitioner:
Unisys Corporation, JACO Electronics, Inc, All American Semiconductor Inc. and others
Not Yet Classified:
Charter Township of Clinton Police & Fire Retirement System, Chemical Valley Pension Fund of West Virginia, Kimball Electronics Tampa, Inc. FKA Reptron Electronics, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Celestica Corporation
Special Master:
Charles B. Renfrew
Claimant:
Oak Point Partners, Inc.
Respondent:
Chip-Tech, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
RAMBUS INC V INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES
as 01-1449
Amicus Curiae:
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC., GlobalPlatform, Inc. and others
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING NORTH AMERICA INC. and INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORP.
Plaintiff-Appellant:
RAMBUS INC.
Rambus, Inc., et al v. Infineon, et al
as 3:2000cv00524
Plaintiff:
Rambus, Inc.
Defendant:
Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp., Infineon Technologies, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Micron Technology, Inc., Hynix Semiconductor, Inc., Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
