Cases 11 - 20 of 28
LOCKE v. FOSTER WHEELER CO.
as 2:2011cv59890
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. LOCKE
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
COLEMAN v. MCNEIL et al
as 3:2011cv00281
Plaintiff:
CECIL COLEMAN
Defendant:
WALTER A MCNEIL, RANDY TIFT, JERMAINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-3249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Allen Locke
as 10-30601
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALLEN J. LOCKE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthur J. Lock, et al. v. Ac And S, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-83959
Defendant:
Ac And S, Inc
Plaintiff:
Arthur J. Lock
Hale et al v. Bayer AG et al
as 4:2009cv01689
Plaintiff:
Stephen R. Hale, Stephen R. Hale, Stephen R. Hale and others
Defendant:
Bayer AG, Bayer CropScience AG, Bayer CropScience GmbH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
LOCK et al v. AC AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv83959
Plaintiff:
JOYCELYN LOCK, JOYCELYN LOCK, ARTHUR J. LOCK and others
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LOCK et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv84777
Plaintiff:
JOCELYN LOCK, JOCELYN LOCK, ARTHUR J. LOCK and others
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION, CONGOLEUM CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Hale et al v. Bayer AG et al
as 2:2009cv00148
Plaintiff:
Stephen R. Hale, Stephen R. Hale, Stephen R. Hale and others
Defendant:
Bayer AG, Bayer Cropscience AG, Bayer Cropscience GMBH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
