Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Albarado et al v. Morgan Buildings & Spas, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03702
Plaintiff:
Helen Albarado , Raymond Albarado , Felix E. Arceneaux and others
Defendant:
Morgan Buildings & Spas, Inc., Morgan Building Systems, Inc., North American Catastrophe Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Mains v. Cache County et al
as 1:2010cv00057
Plaintiff:
Marvin E. Mains
Defendant:
Cache County, Brian Locke, FNU Meacham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braddock Cemetery v. Consol Energy Inc
as 08-3881
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRADDOCK CEMETERY, KARL E. GARY, OSCAR R. IAMS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CONSOL ENERGY INC, the successor and/or assign of RHEINBRUAN U.S. CORPORATION and CNX COAL, the successor and/or assign of CONSOL PENNSYLVANIA COAL COMPANY
Not Party - Appellee:
LOUIS M. TARSARI, C. WILLIAM KENNY and TARASI & TARASI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00880
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Trustees of the Minnesota Cement Masons and Plasterers Fringe Benefit Funds, The v. Soil-Con, Inc et al
as 0:2007cv00614
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Minnesota Cement Masons and Plasterers Fringe Benefit Funds, The and Trustees of the Minnesota Cement Masons and Plasterers Fringe Benefit Funds, The
Defendant:
Soil-Con, Inc and Lori J Pierson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
