Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Winston v. Williams
as 4:2018cv01974
Respondent:
Mark Williams
Petitioner:
Virgil J. Winston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rogers v. City Of Harvey et al
as 1:2016cv05871
Plaintiff:
Truman Rogers
Defendant:
City Of Harvey, Eric J Kellogg, Denard Eaves and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard Carter, Jr. v. DOJ
as 15-7084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD CARTER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, ANDREW J. WINSTON, Chairman of State Board of Corrections and others
Leonard Carter, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 15-6857
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD CARTER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, ANDREW J. WINSTON, Chairman, State Board of Corr., HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VA (VDOC) and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-6855
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Carter v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 3:2015cv00211
Plaintiff:
Leonard Carter, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Commonwealth of Virginia, Andrew J. Winston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Batte v. Harold Clarke
as 15-6024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN BATTE
Plaintiff:
KELVIN A. CANADA, LEE BOYD MALVO, DENIS RIVERA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, VA DOC Director, DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corr. Operations, WARDEN RANDALL MATHENA and others
Kelvin Canada v. Harold Clarke
as 15-6025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELVIN A. CANADA
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BATTE, LEE BOYD MALVO, DENIS RIVERA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, VA DOC Director, DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corr. Operations, WARDEN RANDALL MATHENA and others
Carter v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2014cv00818
Plaintiff:
Leonard Carter, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Andrew J. Winston, Harold W. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
