Cases 11 - 20 of 212
Morris v. AngioDynamics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
James Morris
Defendant:
AngioDynamics, Inc. and Navilyst Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MORRIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08663
Plaintiff:
JAMES MORRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Morris
as 23-50125
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Gregory James Morris
MORRIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
JAMES MORRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Balagia et al
as 4:2022cv01048
Plaintiff:
USA and United States of America
Defendant:
James Morris Balagia, Cara Jones, Casey Coats and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
MORRIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16978
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JAMES MORRIS and CHARLES MORRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Morris et al v. Liberty Personal Insurance Co
as 2:2022cv05019
Plaintiff:
James Morris and Patricia Morris
Defendant:
Liberty Personal Insurance Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Morris et al v. Liberty Personal Insurance Co
as 2:2022cv05016
Plaintiff:
James Morris and Patricia Morris
Defendant:
Liberty Personal Insurance Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MORRIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15465
Plaintiff:
JAMES MORRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Morris v. Onyx Collection, Inc., The
as 5:2022cv04038
Plaintiff:
Shane James Morris
Defendant:
Onyx Collection, Inc., The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
