Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Cobb v. Lewis et al.
as 3:2016cv01474
Plaintiff:
John Cobb
Defendant:
Kathleen Lewis, William D. Gore, San Diego, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barquero v. Obama et al
as 3:2016cv01293
Plaintiff:
Amilcar Barquero
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Eric H. Holder , Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-12891
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Barquero v. Obama et al
as 3:2015cv00562
Plaintiff:
Amilcar Barquero
Defendant:
Barack Obama , Edmund G. Brown, Jr, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb et al v. Harject Sekhon et al
as 2:2014cv00159
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Cobb and John Cobb
Defendant:
Harject Sekhon, Falcon Motor Xpress, Ltd. and Safe Auto Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Cobb v. Unnamed Respondents
as 3:2014cv01513
Petitioner:
John Cobb
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cobb III et al v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv11634
Plaintiff:
John Cobb III and Narcissus Williams
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius Medical Care North America, Fresenius USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
M.K. Weeden Construction v. The State of Montana et al
as 6:2013cv00049
Plaintiff:
M.K. Weeden Construction
Defendant:
The State of Montana , Montana Transportation Commission , Kevin Howlett and others
Intervenor:
M.A. DeAtley Construction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cobb v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2013cv01353
Plaintiff:
John Cobb
Defendant:
Ramiro Rodriguez, Alex Calderson, William Lansdowne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv01304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
