Cases 11 - 19 of 19
US v. Jose Perez
as 19-4179
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE ALBERTO PEREZ, a/k/a Junie
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
PEREZ v. DAVIE COUNTY et al
as 1:2018cv00612
Defendant:
CAMERON SLOAN, J. D. HARTMAN, DAVIE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE ALBERTO PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Jose Perez
as 15-4772
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE ALBERTO PEREZ
Aguilar et al v. Juno Contracting Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv01289
Plaintiff:
William A. Aguilar, Jose Alberto Perez-Guevara and Ivan Rojas
Defendant:
John Brion and Juno Contracting Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Norma G. Perez, Individually, and as Next of Kin of Jose A. Perez, Jr., and as Administrator of the Estate of Jose Alberto Perez, Deceased v. Independent Order of Foresters
as 4:2013cv03178
Plaintiff:
Norma G. Perez, Individually, and as Next of Kin of Jose A. Perez, Jr., and as Administrator of the Estate of Jose Alberto Perez, Deceased
Defendant:
Independent Order of Foresters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
PEREZ v. USA
as 1:2012cv00716
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JOSE ALBERTO PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jose Perez-Guerrero v. U.S. Attorney General
as 12-10261
Petitioner:
JOSE ALBERTO PEREZ-GUERRERO
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Perez-Castillo
as 08-10246
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE ALBERTO PEREZ-CASTILLO, also known as Jesus Carrillo, also known as Jose Castillo-Perez, also known as Arnulfo Casas Rico, also known as Alberto Perez-Castillo
USA v. Perez-Castillo
as 07-11091
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE ALBERTO PEREZ-CASTILLO, also known as Jesus Carrillo, also known as Arnulfo Casas Rico, also known as Alberto Perez-Castillo, also known as Alberto Castillo-Perez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
