Cases 11 - 20 of 152
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00255
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Joseph Andrew Perez v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2022cv08643
Plaintiff:
Joseph Andrew Perez
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Alex Villanueva, Bobby Wynche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROCK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20896
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ANDREW BROCK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Andrews v. San Francisco District Attorney's Office et al
as 4:2022cv06038
Plaintiff:
Travis Joseph Andrews, IV
Defendant:
San Francisco District Attorney's Office and Trans Bay Joint Power Authority Sales Force Tower Travel Hub
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andrews v. San Francisco District Attorney's Office et al
as 3:2022cv00359
Plaintiff:
Travis Joseph Andrews, IV
Defendant:
San Francisco District Attorney's Office and Trans Bay Joint Power Authority Sales Force Tower Travel Hub
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHELTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19330
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ANDREW SHELTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PRIDDY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16690
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ANDREW CASTILLO PRIDDY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STUMP v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15527
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ANDREW STUMP
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Reeves v. Virginia Employment Commission
as 7:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Joseph Andrew Reeves
Defendant:
Virginia Employment Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Towe v. Unknown Defendant(s)
as 2:2022mi00002
Plaintiff:
Joseph Andrew Towe
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant(s)
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
