Cases 11 - 20 of 23
THOMPSON v. WARREN et al
as 3:2013cv04334
Plaintiff:
RICHARD THOMPSON
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN, KENNETH NELSEN, JIMMY BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OBATAIYE v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2013cv04323
Plaintiff:
ODE OBATAIYE
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN , CHARLES E. WARREN, JIMMY BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chaiken et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as ILN/1:13-cv-04800
Plaintiff:
Irwin Chaiken , Carol Chaiken , Anna S Acosta and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis, U.S., Inc. and Sanofi-Synthelabo Inc
Barnes et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv05404
Plaintiff:
Deborah Barnes and Jimmy Barnes
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tormu Prall v. Joseph Bocchini, Jr., et al
as 13-1098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
Chandler v. Raymond Detention Center et al
as 3:2012cv00519
Plaintiff:
Melvin Chandler
Defendant:
Hinds County, Mississippi, Tyrone Lewis, Lieutenant Theralon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tormu Prall v. Joseph Bocchini, Jr., et al
as 12-1760
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
ALLAH v. BARTKOWSKI et al
as 3:2011cv03153
Plaintiff:
JUSTICE RASIDEEN ALLAH
Defendant:
GREG BARTKOWSKI, MICHELE R. RICCI, CHRISTOPHER HOLMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMIREZ v. WAGNER et al
as 3:2011cv02654
Plaintiff:
BERALDO RAMIREZ
Defendant:
RON WAGNER, CHRIS HOLMES, JIMMY BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRALL v. BOCCHINI et al
as 1:2010cv01228
Plaintiff:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant:
CHARLES ELLIS, PHYLLIS OLIVER, MICHELLE R. RICCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
