Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Heron v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2011cv00422
Plaintiff:
Herbert Hugh Heron
Defendant:
Edwin Rodriguez, Albert J. Hadeed, Milissa Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
v. BUTLER et al
as 2:2009cv74086
Defendant:
JOHN CECIL BUTLER, SR., CERTAINTEED CORP., GARLOCK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Estate of John Cecil Spinner v. Anthem Health Plans of Virgini
as 09-1092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESTATE OF JOHN CECIL SPINNER, Deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHEM HEALTH PLANS OF VIRGINIA, INCORPORATED, EMPLOYEES GROUP HEALTH PLAN OF COMMERCIAL GLASS & PLASTICS, INCORPORATED, John M. Hiller, Administrator, COMMERCIAL GLASS & PLASTICS, INCORPORATED and others
Estate of John Cecil Spinner, Deceased v. Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Inc. et al
as 6:2007cv00050
Plaintiff:
Estate of John Cecil Spinner, Deceased
Defendant:
Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Inc., Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Inc., Employees Group Health Plan of Commercial Glass & Plastics, Inc. (John M. Hiller, Administrator) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
SLATER v. US PENETENTIARY COLEMAN, WARDEN
as 1:2007cv00159
Petitioner:
JOHN CECIL SLATER
Respondent:
US PENETENTIARY COLEMAN, WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. Cecil et al
as 5:2007cv00135
Plaintiff:
James Edward Johnson
Defendant:
John Cecil, Ritha Gumbiski and Bill Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slater v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP-I
as 5:2007cv00086
Petitioner:
John Cecil Slater
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP-I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
