Cases 11 - 20 of 90
Smith v. Pettis County et al
as 2:2022cv04165
Plaintiff:
Donna Smith
Defendant:
Pettis County, Brad Anders, Sam Hargrave and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jeude v. City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2022cv00989
Plaintiff:
Todd Jeude
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, Adrian Barnes, Doctor Unknown Mallard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dutcher v. Precythe et al
as 2:2022cv04124
Plaintiff:
Michael Dutcher
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Doris Falkenrath, Raina Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marks v. Precythe, et al.
as 6:2022cv03220
Plaintiff:
Wesley Everette Marks
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, LaDonna M Buckner, Billy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Precythe et al
as 6:2022cv03199
Plaintiff:
Johnell A Bell
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Michele Buckner, Christopher Meier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orr v. Lindsey et al
as 3:2022cv05032
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lynn Orr
Defendant:
Matthew Lindsey, Henson, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Koester et al
as 4:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Christopher E Koester, Kenneth L. Gregory, Mark D Eberwein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Danner v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Nathan Wayne Danner
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danner v. Doe 1 et al
as 6:2022cv03023
Plaintiff:
Nathan Wayne Danner
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garner v. Keen et al
as 4:2021cv00998
Plaintiff:
Oscar Garner
Defendant:
Daniel Keen, John Doe-1, John Doe-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
