Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Lewis v. Lowry et al
as 1:2017cv00046
Plaintiff:
Brandi Lewis
Defendant:
Thomas John Lowry , R2 Dogs, LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Olenick et al v. Vasquez et al
as 1:2015cv00005
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Art Acevedo, Eric Andrade and others
Plaintiff:
M. Rae Nadler-Olenick and Walter Olenick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
An v. Zhang et al
as 1:2013cv05064
Plaintiff:
Lin Jun An
Defendant:
Hui Zhang , Xiaojian Ye , Guang Yu Cheng and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lautenbach et al v. Town of Liberty Grove et al
as 1:2012cv00083
Plaintiff:
Wayne M Lautenbach and Wayne Logcrafters LLP
Defendant:
Town of Liberty Grove, Walter Kalms, William Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Paul v. City of Johnson City et al
as 2:2011cv00247
Defendant:
City of Johnson City , Scott Jenkins and John Lowry
Plaintiff:
Mark Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McEnery et al v. City of San Antonio et al
as 5:2010cv00115
Defendant:
Walter S. Booth, City of San Antonio, Andrew Estrada and others
Plaintiff:
John Lowry and Brian McEnery
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kenneth Giles v. City of Johnson City, et al
as 09-5627
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KENNETH GILES
Defendant:
CITY OF JOHNSON CITY, a Tennessee municipality
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN LOWRY, in his individual capacity
Giles v. City of Johnson City et al
as 2:2008cv00265
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Giles, Kenneth Giles, Kenneth Giles and others
Defendant:
City of Johnson City and John Lowry
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-60702
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
