Cases 11 - 20 of 158
Murray v. US
as 23-2287
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN MURRAY and SPOUT SPRINGS MOUNTAIN RESORT
Plaintiff:
NANCY MURRAY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Murray v. Lumpkin
as 23-50494
Petitioner / Appellant:
Allen John Murray
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
MURRAY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13217
Plaintiff:
JOHN MURRAY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Service Employees Pension Fund of Upstate New York et al v. Ellicott Development Company
as 5:2023cv00536
Plaintiff:
Service Employees Pension Fund of Upstate New York, Adam Fitzgerald, John Murray and others
Defendant:
Ellicott Development Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Williams v. L T C W et al
as 3:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
Natalie Williams
Defendant:
Louisiana Transitional Center for Women, Chris Stinson, John Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15346
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thompson v. Louisiana Transitional Center for Women et al
as 3:2022cv06061
Plaintiff:
Shanell Lynn Thompson
Defendant:
Louisiana Transitional Center for Women, Chris Stinson and John Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. BTRS Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01508
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
BTRS Holdings Inc., Flint Lane, Robert Farrell and others
Smith v. BTRS Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09808
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
BTRS Holdings Inc., Flint Lane, Robert Farrell and others
Murray v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv00323
Plaintiff:
John Murray
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
