Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Norton v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv02914
Defendant:
All Staff Named Herein, South Carolina Department of Corrections and Kirkland Correctional Institution
Plaintiff:
Joseph David Norton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2020cv00176
Petitioner:
Joseph Hercules Norton
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ECP Property II LLC v. Joseph S. Norton et al
as 1:2020cv00303
Plaintiff:
ECP Property II LLC
Defendant:
35 Kermit Place LLC, 29 Kermit Place LLC, 771 Hopkinson Boyland LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Norton v. University of Texas Medical Branch et al
as 3:2018cv00279
Defendant:
Susan Rivas, Dr Owen Murry, Michael Stewart and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph H Norton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton, III v. Williams et al
as 2:2016cv00894
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian E. Williams
Petitioner:
Joseph Martin Norton, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norton, III v. Williams et al
as 2:2015cv01982
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian E. Williams
Petitioner:
Joseph Martin Norton, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norton v. Enns et al
as 2:2014cv00040
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hercules Norton
Defendant:
Ron Enns, Kent Birdsong and Joe Marr Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2013cv00215
Petitioner:
Joseph Hercules Norton
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Artis et al v. Amphenol Corporation
as 3:2011cv00876
Plaintiff:
Crystal Artis , Helen Ballard , Raymond Ballard and others
Defendant:
Amphenol Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
