Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Owens v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00549
Petitioner:
Sean Justin Owens
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
OWENS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv65720
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN OWENS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OWENS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv42560
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN OWENS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv70095
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN OWEN MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZAGER et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03160
Plaintiff:
JESSICA ANDERSEN, ZACH DANGERFIELD, KENNETH MCGAHA and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Zager et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02143
Plaintiff:
Jessica Andersen, Zach Dangerfield, Kenneth McGaha and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Owens v. Marriott International, Inc.
as 1:2019cv02078
Plaintiff:
Justin Owens
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc. d/b/a New York Marriott at the Brooklyn Bridge, Marriott International, Inc. and Marriott International, Inc. doing business as New York Marriott at the Brooklyn Bridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Sean Owens
as 19-10822
Defendant / Appellant:
SEAN JUSTIN OWENS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Clark et al v. Conway et al
as 1:2018cv05416
Plaintiff:
Kelda Lisette Gordon, Nicolas Stewart, Wali K. Bascoe and others
Defendant:
Lt. Col. Carl Sims and R.L. (Butch) Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
