Cases 11 - 20 of 51
KING v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2020cv00305
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
KORY S KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00263
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BARKER v. YORK COUNTY et al
as 2:2020cv00163
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, YORK COUNTY, KEVIN MCCORMICK and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BARKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GEORGE v. YORK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2019cv00569
Defendant:
WILLIAM KING, YORK COUNTY JAIL and OFFICER CUMMERS
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R GEORGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PLOURDE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv00532
Defendant:
MAINE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, KNOX COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Plaintiff:
GLEN PLOURDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. SOUTHERN ROAD & BRIDGE LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00470
Defendant:
JMM ENTERPRISES INC, DYLAN R ALLARD, MICHAEL G TSANGARIS and others
Plaintiff:
SANDRA E KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DUNNIGAN v. YORK COUNTY et al
as 2:2019cv00450
Defendant:
DONOVAN CRAM, YORK COUNTY, WILLIAM KING and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN DUNNIGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00369
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BARRONTON v. LAMBREW, PHD et al
as 1:2019cv00215
Defendant:
PATRICK LYNN, NICOLE NORWOOD, JEANNE M LAMBREW, PHD and others
Plaintiff:
TONI BARRONTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF9 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. KING
as 1:2019cv00119
Defendant:
GREG A KING
Interested Party:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Plaintiff:
US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF9 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
