Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02260
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Floyd Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02251
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, S.C.S.O. Jail Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02241
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02239
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County City, S.C.S.O. Jail Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pipkin v. Bonner et al
as 2:2023cv02095
Plaintiff:
Byron Pipkin
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Kirk Fields, Chief Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dove v. Friday et al
as 1:2021cv02372
Plaintiff:
Corey Lee Dove
Defendant:
Cleveland Friday, C.O. Elijah Garnett and Lt. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
House v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2021cv01050
Plaintiff:
LaDarryl House
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Anthony Wills, Lt. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARRINGTON, JR. v. GATLING et al
as 1:2021cv00545
Plaintiff:
THEODORE MACON CARRINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
LT. LEE GATLING and PINEHURST N.C. POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owl Feather-Gorbey v. Monfous et al
as 0:2020cv01116
Defendant:
Lt. Bernett, Lt. Lee, CO Dear and others
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
