Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Sanmedica, International, LLC et al v. New U Life Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv00405
Plaintiff:
Sanmedica, International, LLC and Sanmedica IP Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
New U Life Corporation, Alexy Goldstein and Michael-John Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Nathan Hickey v. Protective Life Corporation
as 20-1076
Defendant / Appellee:
PROTECTIVE LIFE CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN HICKEY
New U Life Corporation v. ITC
as 20-1214
Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Appellant:
NEW U LIFE CORPORATION
T1 Payments LLC v. New U Life Corporation
as 2:2019cv01816
Defendant:
New U Life Corporation
Plaintiff:
T1 Payments LLC
Interested Party:
Rome & Associates, A.P.C. and Bradley O Cebeci
Counter Defendant:
Debra Karen King, Debra Karen Kasdon, J.L. Marc Lefebvre and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Doe v. Friends for Life Corporation
as 2:2018cv02346
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Friends for Life Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Larkin v. West Coast Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2018cv00273
Plaintiff:
Andrew S. Larkin
Defendant:
West Coast Life Insurance Company and Protective Life Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-11270
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hickey v. Protective Life Corporation
as 3:2018cv03018
Plaintiff:
Nathan Hickey
Defendant:
Protective Life Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
United States of America v. Sheri Farnham Rate
as 2:2017cv07126
Garnishee:
Protective Life Corporation
Defendant:
Sheri Farnham Rate
Plaintiff:
United States of America
General Re Life Corporation v. Lincoln National Life Insuranc
as 17-2496
Plaintiff-Cross-Defendant - Appellant:
General Re Life Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
