Cases 11 - 20 of 2,294
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
INTERNATIONAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES v. MARS, INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv00894
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES
Defendant:
MARS, INCORPORATED, MARS WRIGLEY CONFECTIONERY, CARGILL, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Horton v. Mars, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Paul Horton
Defendant:
Mars, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. Frick Real Estate, Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A., Oakley, Inc., COSTA DEL MAR, INC and others
Defendant:
FRICK REAL ESTATE, LTD, TRADERS WORLD, INC, JAY FRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Long v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, et al.
as 24-1557
Plaintiff:
RICHARD D. LONG
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, 3M COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Aparicio v. Mar Tile Design Corp. et al
as 6:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Gustavo E. Aparicio
Defendant:
Mar Tile Design Corp. and Jose J. Herrera
Costa del Mar Inc v. LTBC LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Costa del Mar Inc
Defendant:
LTBC LLC an Oklahoma limited liability company doing business as Big Hill Trading Company and Pawn, Thomas Burg and Larry Champlin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Ohana v. Mars Petcare US Inc.
as 1:2024cv01316
Plaintiff:
Rachel Edrei Ohana
Defendant:
Mars Petcare US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LEAVITT v. SKY WARRIOR BAHAMAS LIMITED
as 1:2024cv00886
Plaintiff:
ABRAHAM LEAVITT
Defendant:
SKY WARRIOR BAHAMAS LIMITED, d/b/a BAHA MAR CASINO, CHOW TAI FOOK ENTERPRISES LTD. and SKY WARRIOR BAHAMAS LIMITED doing business as BAHA MAR CASINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
