Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
NIKOLAISHVILI v. STEELE
as 1:2022cv03630
Plaintiff:
NODAR NIKOLAISHVILI
Defendant:
MATTHEW STEELE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Perez v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Matthew Steel, Cody McGallion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Lumpkin et al
as 9:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Matthew Steel, Cody McGallion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steel et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 2:2021cv00894
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad, Marquita Monique Matthews, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Kayla Steel and Matthew Steel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez v. Sells et al
as 5:2021cv00006
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
Asst Warden Edward B. Sells and Matthew Steels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEELE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv00418
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW STEELE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steele v. State of Utah
as 2:2017cv00956
Petitioner:
Matthew Steele
Respondent:
State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Steele v. Green Metals, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv09919
Plaintiff:
Thomas Matthew Steele
Defendant:
Green Metals, Inc. and Rich Macomath
Cause Of Action: 29 USC 2601: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Steele et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv27744
Plaintiff:
Leslie Steele and Matthew Steele
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
