Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Seagen Inc. v. Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.
as 2:2020cv00337
Defendant:
Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Seagen Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
David Folsom and Shane A Nelson
Intervenor Defendant:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and AstraZeneca UK Limited
Petitioner:
Non-Party The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Tilda Gaines v. MD Anderson Services Corp., et al
as 20-20070
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TILDA GAINES
Defendant / Appellee:
MD ANDERSON SERVICES CORPORATION and UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER
Williams v. 1960 Family Practice PA et al
as 4:2019cv04522
Defendant:
Francisco Ortiz, Tara A Hagopain, Krystal J Kimiagaree and others
Plaintiff:
Orlando V Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv03939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Williams v. Gavino et al
as 4:2019cv01488
Defendant:
Francisco Ortiz, Madeline A. Hunt, The Methodist Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Orlando V. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER v. AZAR
as 1:2019cv01525
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00390
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04291
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Craft-Demming v. MD Anderson Cancer Center
as 4:2018cv03296
Plaintiff:
Tamika Craft-Demming
Defendant:
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
