Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Brown v. Lumpkin
as 23-70004
Petitioner / Appellant:
Micah Brown
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Brown v. Wilson et al
as 1:2022cv00363
Plaintiff:
Micah Brown
Defendant:
R. Wilson, D. Smith, Kilpatrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv09257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Villacampo Jones v. Wolf et al
as 1:2020cv00516
Defendant:
Director Ken Cuccinelli, Associate Director Daniel Renaud, Boise Field Director Micah Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Mrs. Vergie Villacampo Jones and Vergie Villacampo Jones
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv55684
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICAH BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv17898
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICAH BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv85888
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICAH BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03723
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Brown v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2019cv02301
Petitioner:
Micah Brown
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Lorie Davis and Director, TDCJ-CID
Interested Party:
Jeremy Schepers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ADERHOLDT et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv01382
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bailey, Daniel Bright, Daniel Conley and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
