Cases 11 - 20 of 62
SHARPE et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv17650
Plaintiff:
FLORENCE SHARPE and MICHAEL SHARPE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHARPE et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv17650
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
FLORENCE SHARPE and MICHAEL SHARPE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jamal Hendrix v. M. Sharp, et al
as 21-15358
Defendant / Appellee:
ELLIOT BURLEIGH, H. CHUNG, C. DAVIS, Sgt. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAL DAMON HENDRIX, AKA Jamar Hendrix
SHARP v. COLLECTORS UNIVERSE, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv20594
Defendant:
JOSEPH J. ORLANDO, JENNIFER H. LEUER, JON M. SULLIVAN and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHARP
SHARP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv98406
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHARP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wooten v. Coleman et al (TV2)
as 4:2020cv00003
Defendant:
Jimmy Coleman, Kellie Fogus, Michael Sharp and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Wooten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Sharp et al
as 3:2019cv00471
Plaintiff:
Rickie Hill
Defendant:
R. Dugan, H Wickham, Renee Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Baker et al
as 3:2019cv00450
Defendant:
H. Wickham, R. Baker, Renee Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Rickie L. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Wickham et al
as 3:2019cv00444
Defendant:
H. Wickham, R. Dugan, Renee Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Rickie L. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11370
Plaintiff:
Steve White, Christine Cole, Wayne Huffman and others
Defendant:
Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC and General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
