Cases 11 - 20 of 679
Mora Alvarez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2698
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO MORA ALVAREZ, MARIA MADRIGAL GARIBO, MARIA MORA MADRIGAL and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United Spinal Association, et al. v. State of California, et al.
as 24-2755
Plaintiff:
UNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION, NOT DEAD YET, INSTITUTE FOR PATIENTS RIGHTS and others
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GAVIN NEWSOM, ROBERT BONTA and others
Other:
COMPASSION & CHOICES ACTION NETWORK, LAMBERT BASSLER, JUDITH COBURN and others
United Spinal Association, et al. v. State of California, et al.
as 24-2751
Plaintiff:
UNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION, NOT DEAD YET, INSTITUTE FOR PATIENTS RIGHTS and others
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor, ROBERT BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General and others
(SS) Madrigal v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Eredina Madrigal
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Turner v. Weston, et al.
as 24-1856
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. TURNER and Anthony Richardo Turner
Defendant:
W. WESTON, A. CAMPIN, Judge, Martinez Court - Contra Costa County, C. BIRCH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Madrigal v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00980
Plaintiff:
Richard Madrigal
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Flores v. Madrigal et al
as 2:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Jose Felipe Flores
Defendant:
Judge Melissa Madrigal, Linda Schaure and Bobby Galvan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
