Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Jamal Hendrix v. James Cox, et al
as 17-17047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMAL DAMON HENDRIX
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES G. COX, SHERYL FOSTER, RENEE BAKER, Warden and others
Matthew White v. Rene Baker, et al
as 16-16638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW SCOTT WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
RENE BAKER, M. BYRNE, T. SANDOVAL and others
Mallinger v. Outerwall Inc et al
as 2:2016cv01316
Plaintiff:
Jesse Mallinger
Defendant:
Outerwall, Inc, Erik E Prusch, Nelson C Chan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Mallinger v. Chatila et al
as 4:2016cv00732
Plaintiff:
Jesse Mallinger
Defendant:
Ahmad R. Chatila , Antonio R. Alvarez , Clayton C. Daley, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
White v. Travis et al
as 3:2016cv00241
Defendant:
Rene Baker, Harold Mike Byrne, Mark Drain and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Scott White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hendrix v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2016cv00067
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Jayson Artinger, Renee Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Baker et al
as 3:2015cv00262
Defendant:
Rene Baker, M. Byrne, Mark Drain and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Scott White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THE GEORGE LEON FAMILY TRUST ET AL. V. EXELIS INC. ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00466
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BALLWEBER, JESSE MALLINGER, THE GEORGE LEON FAMILY TRUST and others
Defendant:
HERMAN E. BULLS, EXELIS, INC., RALPH HAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Mallinger v. Travelers Companies, Inc., The
as 1:2014cv02368
Plaintiff:
Richard Mallinger
Defendant:
Travelers Companies, Inc., The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
