Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Miles v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as LAE/2:12-cv-00798
Plaintiff:
Janice Marie Miles
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Miles v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00798
Plaintiff:
Janice Marie Miles
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zorn v. State of Vermont
as 11-4744
Petitioner:
Robert E. Zorn
Respondent:
State of Vermont, United States of America, Vermont State Police and others
Zorn v. State of Vermont
as 11-4566
Petitioner:
Robert E. Zorn
Respondent:
United States of America, Vermont State Police, Rider, Trooper and others
Zorn v. The State of Vermont et al
as 1:2011cv00221
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Zorn
Defendant:
The State of Vermont, The United States of America, Vermont State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zorn v. The State of Vermont et al
as 1:2011cv00985
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Zorn
Defendant:
The State of Vermont, The United States of America, Vermont State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv04725
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Mary Miles v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-76413
Defendant:
A.r. Wilfley & Sons
Plaintiff:
Mary Miles
MILES v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv76413
Plaintiff:
MARY MILES
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Miles-Richardson v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2009cv11275
Petitioner:
Rose Mary Miles-Richardson
Respondent:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
