Cases 11 - 20 of 1,767
Masel v. The Chemours Company et al
as 1:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Todd Masel
Defendant:
The Chemours Company, Mark E. Newman, Sameer Ralhan and others
Petitioner:
Cindy Nguyen
Memphis City Cartage, LLC v. Specialty Plastic Recycling, LLC et al.
as 1:2024cv00494
Defendant:
Theodore Del Medico, Specialty Plastic Recycling, LLC, Specialty Processing, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Memphis City Cartage, LLC
Receiver:
Mark E Dottore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Morrow v. Collazo et al
as 1:2024cv02037
Plaintiff:
McKenzie Morrow
Defendant:
Angel O. Collazo, Everardo Bracamontes, Jr., Mark E. Hoss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hamid Karamian v. Henrik Fisker et al
as 2:2024cv01867
Plaintiff:
Hamid Karamian
Defendant:
Henrik Fisker, Geeta Gupta-Fisker, Mark E. Hickson and others
Fisher v. O'Brien
as 3:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Darrel R Fisher
Defendant:
Mark E O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sid Azizi et al v. Henrick Fisker et al
as 2:2024cv01619
Plaintiff:
Sid Azizi and Saed Albittar
Defendant:
Henrick Fisker, Geeta Gupta-Fisker, John Finnucan and others
Anand Roy v. Henrik Fisker et al
as 2:2024cv01551
Plaintiff:
Anand Roy
Defendant:
Henrik Fisker, Geeta Gupta-Fisker, John Finnucan and others
(PS) Bledsoe v. Jacot et al
as 2:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Donnell Bledsoe
Defendant:
Katy Jacot, Mark E. Thiel, Pearlie Bledsoe Townes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Uvaydov v. Fisker et al
as 1:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Zalmon Uvaydov
Defendant:
Henrik Fisker, Geeta Gupta-Fisker, Wendy J. Greuel and others
E. et al v. Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield et al
as 2:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Mark E. and C. E.
Defendant:
Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield and Maximus Employees Welfare Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
