Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00511
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
O'CONNOR v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13276
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KEITH O'CONNOR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Findsen v. Kijakazi
as 3:2021cv00187
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keith Findsen
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv79360
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KEITH SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv01137
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rodriguez Ortiz v. Jefferson County, Tennessee (PLR2)
as 3:2017cv00401
Plaintiff:
Luis Rafael Rodriguez Ortiz
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Tennessee , Eddie Mafnas, Karen Clevenger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallingford v. Werner Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Nebraska Werner Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Werner Ent. et al
as 6:2017cv00181
Defendant:
Matthew Keith Casey and Werner Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Nebraska Werner Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Werner Ent.
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Wallingford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Douglas et al v. Fruitland, City of et al
as 1:2016cv00283
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keith Douglas , Justin Smith and Aubrianne Iwasa
Defendant:
Fruitland, City of and Payette County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gayle v. United States of America
as 8:2016cv00485
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keith Gayle
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Newman v. Payette, The City of et al
as 1:2015cv00145
Plaintiff:
Monica Newman and Matthew Keith Douglas
Defendant:
Payette, The City of and Fruitland, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
