Cases 11 - 20 of 751
Speidel v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Maura Speidel
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. and Humana, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
T. et al v. Oxford Health Insurance et al
as 2:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Peter T., Maura K. and M. T.
Defendant:
Oxford Health Insurance, Oxford Health Plans, Advanced Benefit Strategies and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1208
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Yagop et al v. Bam Bar LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Silvee Yagop, Maura Lund, Danielle Shoup and others
Defendant:
Bam Bar LLC, Bam Bar WC LLC, Bae Bar LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Harel Talasazan v. Robert M. Farrell et al
as 2:2024cv01356
Defendant:
Attorney Poonam Patidar, Robert M. Farrell, Maria R. Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Harel Talasazan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Char v. Tresch, et al.
as 24-868
Plaintiff:
MARK ALAN CHAR
Defendant:
MAURA TRESCH, RICHARD BANNER, DEANE HATAKEYAMA and others
Bright v. Gandy et al
as 1:2024cv01425
Plaintiff:
Douglas Bright
Defendant:
Dominique Gandy, Douglas Schofield, Maura McMahon Zeller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Jeannite v. Flaherty et al
as 1:2024cv10364
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
Maureen Flaherty, Charles Marshall, Judge Maura and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
