Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Barker et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03392
Plaintiff:
Domitilia Beatrice Ortiz-Valdez, Anthony Reyes, Benny Wilkerson and others
Defendant:
Tyco Fire Products LP, National Foam Inc, Kidde PLC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
El v. Wean et al
as 2:2018cv01519
Plaintiff:
Bakha Yawuti El
Defendant:
Matthew Wean, Diane Turner, B Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClary v. Prudhomme
as 4:2017cv01757
Plaintiff:
Tracy McClary
Defendant:
Lu Ann Winfield Prudhomme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McClary v. Prudhomme
as 4:2017cv01759
Plaintiff:
Ian McClary
Defendant:
Lu Ann Winfield Prudhomme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pope v. Barnwell County School District No 19 et al
as 1:2016cv01627
Plaintiff:
Teresa Pope
Defendant:
Barnwell County School District No 19, Carroll Priester, Ethel T Faust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClary v. Rytec Corporation
as 3:2015cv04227
Plaintiff:
Samuel McClary
Defendant:
Rytec Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lynch et al v. Dining Concepts Group LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00580
Defendant:
Dining Concepts Group LLC, Sandeep Patel, John Does 1 through 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Lynch, John Michael Jones, Brittany Whitehead and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lloyd v. Williamsburg Detention Center et al
as 5:2014cv04446
Plaintiff:
George F Lloyd, Jr
Defendant:
Williamsburg Detention Center, Williamsburg County Detention Center, Ms Pressely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClary v. Sysco Columbia LLC
as 3:2014cv02606
Plaintiff:
Samuel McClary
Defendant:
Sysco Columbia LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharpe v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2013cv01538
Plaintiff:
Martin James Sharpe
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, William Akerman, Unknown Dentist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
