Cases 11 - 20 of 189
Adams v. Baker et al
as 6:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Adams
Defendant:
Jason Baker and Lewis Mathew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ADAMS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10117
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVID ADAMS, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
O'Dell v. The Community Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv03543
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
The Community Financial Corporation, Michael B. Adams, James M. Burke and others
Adams v. Sgt. Bragg et al
as 6:2023cv00025
Petitioner:
Michael Paul Adams
Respondent:
Sgt. Bragg and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Congo v. TQI, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00761
Plaintiff:
Tyndsom M. Congo
Defendant:
TQI, INC. and Michael J. Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pi Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
ADAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv65306
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J ADAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curtis v. City of Detroit, et al.
as 2:2021cv12342
Plaintiff:
Crystal Curtis, Duly Appointed Personal Representative for the Estate of Michael Contrell Adams, deceased
Defendant:
City of Detroit, a Municipal entity, Chief James White, Police Officer John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
