Cases 11 - 20 of 242
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv24259
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DARRELL THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harris v. Thomas et al
as 1:2023cv03983
Plaintiff:
Dontavious Matthew Harris
Defendant:
Michael N. Thomas, Newton County Sheriff Office Employees, Medical Team/NaphCare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Morrison et al
as 2:2023cv01009
Petitioner:
Michael LeRoy Thomas
Respondent:
J Morrison and P Harvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Woodruff et al
as 3:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Thomas
Defendant:
Sheriff James Woodruff, Troup Co. Sheriff Dept, Dietian Donna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Thomas v. Adam Douglas
as 22-2121
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY THOMAS
Respondent / Appellee:
ADAM DOUGLAS, Acting Warden, Saginaw Correctional Facility
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24878
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMAS v. KOLEHOUSE et al
as 2:2022cv00578
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY THOMAS
Defendant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY KOLEHOUSE and TROMLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
as 6:2022cv04388
Petitioner:
Michael Darrell Thomas and Michael Darnell Thomas
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21760
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMAS et al
as 3:2022cv21759
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ERIC THOMAS and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
