Cases 11 - 20 of 108
Ball v. Federal Detention Center et al
as 2:2023cv00710
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Ball
Defendant:
Federal Detention Center and Unknown Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feds for Medical Freedom v. Blinken et al
as 1:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Feds for Medical Freedom, Marie Ballerini-Hougnon, Donald Carroll and others
Defendant:
Anthony J. Blinken, Department of State, Carol Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06022
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
USA v. Shawn Ball
as 22-30193
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SHAWN MICHAEL BALL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv06474
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2298
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv06340
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chijioke v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00346
Petitioner:
Remigius N. Chijioke
Respondent:
Mr. Garland, Mr. Alejandro Mayorkas, Mr. Thomas Feely and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02592
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv06109
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
