Cases 11 - 20 of 186
The Wilderness Society v. Bureau of Land Management
as 23-1594
Petitioner:
THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY
Respondent:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior and MITCHELL LEVERETTE, in his official capacity as State Director, Bureau of Land Management, Eastern States
Intervenor:
MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC
The Wilderness Society v. United States Forest Service
as 23-1592
Petitioner:
THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, HOMER L. WILKES, in his official capacity as Under Secretary for Natural Resources and Environment, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and others
Intervenor:
MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.19 Acres of Land, Owned By Cletus Woodrow Bohon
as 23-1348
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
0.19 ACRES OF LAND, OWNED BY CLETUS WOODROW BOHON AND BEVERLY ANN BOHON, Montgomery County Tax Map Parcel No. 030271 and Being MVP Parcel No. VA-MN-5233 (AR MN-278.01) and 2.74 ACRES OF LAND, OWNED BY CLETUS WOODROW BOHON AND BEVERLY ANN BOHON, Montgomery County Tax Map Parcel No. 017761 and Being MVP Parcel No. VA-MO-022
Appalachian Voices v. United States Department of the Interior
as 23-1384
Petitioner:
APPALACHIAN VOICES, WILD VIRGINIA, WEST VIRGINIA RIVERS COALITION and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Interior and others
Intervenor:
MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 3.58 Acres of Land, Owned by Charles C. Hylton and Sandra W. Hylton, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, et al.
as 4:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
3.58 Acres of Land, Owned by Charles C. Hylton and Sandra W. Hylton, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC and 4.669 Acres of Land, Owned by Charles C. Hylton and Sandra W. Hylton, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Johnson et al v. Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
as 1:2022cv00548
Plaintiff:
Heather L. Johnson and Richard Allen Johnson
Defendant:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
City of Quincy, MA, et al v. FERC
as 22-1201
Petitioner:
QUINCY, MA, BRAINTREE, MA and FORE RIVER RESIDENTS AGAINST THE COMPRESSOR STATION (FRRACS)
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Interested Party:
SANDRA PETERS, REBECCA HAUGH, GARY PETERS and others
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 1.43 Acres of Land, Owned by Junior Franklin McBride and Joyce W. McBride, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
1.43 Acres of Land, Owned by Junior Franklin McBride and Joyce W. McBride, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.41 Acres of Land, Owned by Jay Michael Smith, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
0.41 Acres of Land, Owned by Jay Michael Smith, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 3.73 Acres of Land, Owned by Nancy H. Weatherford, John G. Mitchell and Phyllis H. Mitchell, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
3.73 Acres of Land, Owned by Nancy H. Weatherford, John G. Mitchell and Phyllis H. Mitchell, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
