Cases 11 - 20 of 133
Fields v. Macomber et al
as 3:2023cv02107
Plaintiff:
Marcus Brent Fields
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Kathleen Allison, Raymond Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv05118
Plaintiff:
Willie J Mitchell
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, The Fulton County Georgia, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Wilcox et al
as 3:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Ramirez Brandon Lee and Brandon Lee Ramirez
Defendant:
DW Mr. Wilcox, DW Ms. Stewart, Warden Andrew McFarlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cavins v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00198
Petitioner:
Correy Cavins
Respondent:
Warden Mr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Henderson v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00202
Petitioner:
Shane Henderson
Respondent:
Warden Mr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dixon v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00182
Petitioner:
Dashawn Tariq Dixon
Respondent:
Warden Mr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dean v. Mrs. Brown, et al
as 3:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Todd G. Dean
Defendant:
Warden Mrs. Brown, Counselor, Case Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00088
Petitioner:
Jeremy Arsenio Smith
Respondent:
Mr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stum v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00077
Petitioner:
Terrance M. Stum
Respondent:
Mr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dixon v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00071
Petitioner:
Dashawn Tyreek Dixon
Respondent:
Mr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
