Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. USDOI, et al
as 22-15536
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, MARTHA WILLIAMS, Director United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, STATE OF UTAH and others
Petitioner:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN SHEEP INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION and others
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. USFS, et al
as 21-15907
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC. and NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GRAND CANYON WILDLANDS COUNCIL, SIERRA CLUB and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a United States Government Agency
MAZAHREH et al v. GREWAL et al
as 1:2020cv17598
Defendant:
MARK P. TARANTINO, THOMAS BRYAN, GURBIR GREWAL and others
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY RIFLE & PISTOL CLUBS, INC., BILLY NUNES DE ALMEIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCARTHY et al v. BAKER et al
as 1:2020cv10701
Plaintiff:
TROY CITY TACTICAL LLC, LAURIE WARNER, WILLIAM R. BIEWENGA and others
Defendant:
CHARLES D. BAKER, MATTHEW SONNABEND, ROBERT F. RUFO and others
Amicus Curiae:
National Shooting Sports Foundation, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., GUN OWNERS ACTION LEAGUE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell et al v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2018cv05931
Plaintiff:
Daniel G. Mitchell, National Rifle Association of America, Inc, Armen Tooloee and others
Defendant:
State of Washington, State of Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson and Robert Ferguson
Intervenor Defendant:
Safe Schools Safe Communities
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Center for Bio. Diversity v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 18-35629
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant - Appellee:
RYAN K. ZINKE, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, ALASKA OUTDOOR COUNCIL, BIG GAME FOREVER and others
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. USFS, et al
as 17-15790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, SIERRA CLUB and GRAND CANYON WILDLANDS COUNCIL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a United States Government Agency
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL and NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC.,
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. USFS, et al
as 17-15790
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. and NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC.,
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GRAND CANYON WILDLANDS COUNCIL, SIERRA CLUB and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a United States Government Agency
Matthew Grace, et al v. DC, et al
as 16-7067
Amicus Curiae:
Everytown for Gun Safety, State of Montana, State of Hawaii and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Peter Newsham, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Metropolitan Police Department, Cathy L. Lanier, in her official capacity as Chief of Police for the Metropolitan Police Department and District of Columbia
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Matthew Grace and Pink Pistols
Ivan Pena, et al v. Stephen Lindley
as 15-15449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN PENA, ROY VARGAS, DONA CROSTON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN LINDLEY, Chief of the California Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., CALIFORNIA RIFLE AND PISTOL ASSOCIATION, LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
